Skip to content

SHAPIRO, David L. [Ruth Bader Ginsburg].

New York University Law Review: Continuity and Change in Statutory Interpretation.

New York: New York University Law Review , 1992.

Out of Stock Item Number: RRB-151267
+$450
November 1992 Offprint of the New York University Law Review Containing David L. Shapiro's Continuity and Change in Statutory Interpretation; With a Typed Letter Inscribed by Him to Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Original November 1992 offprint of the New York University Law Review containing David L. Shapiro’s Continuity and Change in Statutory Interpretation. Octavo, original publisher's wrappers, volume 67, number 5. Accompanied by a typed letter on Harvard Law School stationary laid in, inscribed and signed by David L. Shapiro to Ruth Bader Ginsburg. The letter reads in full, "For Ruth - Although this is printed in an issue dated late 1992, it just appeared. I hope it will be of interest to you. With warmest regards to you and Marty. David." From the library of American lawyer and jurist Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Ruth Bader Ginsburg served as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1993 until her death in 2020 and was responsible for some of the most eventful legal decisions of the past half-century. Nominated by President Bill Clinton in 1993 to replace retiring justice Byron White, Ginsburg became the first Jewish woman and the second woman to serve on the Court, after Sandra Day O’Connor. Ginsburg spent much of her legal career as an advocate for gender equality and women’s rights, winning many arguments before the Supreme Court. During her tenure as associate justice of the Supreme Court, Ginsburg received attention for her fiery and passionate dissents that reflected liberal views of the law. She was popularly dubbed “the Notorious R.B.G.”, a moniker she later embraced. She authored several important majority opinions related to gender discrimination, voting rights, and affirmative action in cases such as United States v. Virginia (1996) which struck down the Virginia Military Institute’s male-only admissions policy as violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, Olmstead v. L.C. (1999) in which the Court ruled that mental illness is a form of disability covered under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc. (2000) in which the Court held that residents have standing to seek fines for an industrial polluter that affected their interests and that is able to continue doing so. In fine condition with light paperclip impressions to the front panel. Housed in a custom half morocco clamshell box by the Harcourt Bindery.
Out of Stock

Other Books by this Author

New York University Law Review: Continuity and Change in Statutory Interpretation.

New York University Law Review: Continuity and Change in Statutory Interpretation.

$3,500.00
Wrong Turns: The Eleventh Amendment and the Pennhurst Case.

Wrong Turns: The Eleventh Amendment and the Pennhurst Case.

New York University Law Review: Continuity and Change in Statutory Interpretation.

New York University Law Review: Continuity and Change in Statutory Interpretation.

Indiana Law Journal; Supplemental Jurisdiction: A Confession, an Avoidance, and a Proposal.

Indiana Law Journal; Supplemental Jurisdiction: A Confession, an Avoidance, and a Proposal.